The primary criteria for acceptance of a submitted paper are the scientific quality of the paper and the potential contribution to neurodiversity employment research and practice. To this end, consider these three criteria:
- Relevance to the workshop: The extent to which a paper meets the workshop goals and may relate to the preparation, recruitment, persistence, and advancement of neurodivergent individuals in the workplace.
- Potential scholarly contribution: The scientific quality of the submission relative to the theoretical grounding and/or methodological clarity and empirical rigor as well as originality of the paper.
- Broader impact: The relevance of the work to neurodiversity employment practice and its potential for impact on society.
- Quality of presentation: The quality of the writing and organization of ideas and conclusions.
Each submission will be reviewed by at least two members of the program committee. Papers submitted to the Neurodiversity at Work Research Conference must not have been published elsewhere while under consideration for the Neurodiversity at Work Research Conference. Contravention of this concurrent submission policy will be deemed a serious breach of scientific ethics, and appropriate action will be taken in all such cases.
0
0